Best Mobile Proxies for Social Media Automation
August 27, 2025 • César Daniel Barreto
🏆 Top 9 Mobile Proxy Providers 2025
Running more than a few social accounts quickly teaches you the pain of blocks and bans. Instagram, TikTok, even Facebook—repetitive logins from the same IP trigger alarms. Mobile proxies route through real 4G/5G carrier networks, so sessions look like normal users. Below is my 2025 ranking based on real campaigns; stars represent position on this list.
The everyday driver. Pricing doesn’t crush you, setup is quick, and performance stays steady enough to run 20+ Instagram accounts for weeks without bans. You lose some ultra-fine targeting, but you save hours of fiddling.
Pros
- Reliable on IG/TikTok automations
- Pricing tiers fit growing agencies
- Simple rotation rules; easy API
- Responsive, human support
Cons
- Limited free trial
Best for: Agencies juggling dozens of accounts, warm-ups, content scheduling.
Great sandbox and backup. Minutes to set up and cheap enough that mistakes don’t hurt. At larger scales, inconsistencies show—use it for tests and low-stakes flows.
Pros
- Very affordable entry
- Quick setup; simple API
- Transparent pricing
- Handy backup pool
Cons
- Shared IP stability varies
- Not ideal for fragile accounts
- Coverage weaker than top players
- No premium support tiers
Best for: Individuals experimenting, backups, and quick prototypes.
Pinpoint geo targeting for location-specific ad tests. Powerful, but costs can balloon without tight usage control. Best when precision pays for itself.
Pros
- Accurate geo/carrier filters
- Large proxy catalog
- Reliable uptime
- Integrations for advanced stacks
Cons
- Costs jump fast if unchecked
- Panel can overwhelm beginners
- Support priority tied to spend
- Setup feels complex initially
Best for: Advanced ad testing and global targeting experiments.
SIM-based proxies with pristine trust. Fantastic for fragile influencer accounts, but scaling hurts due to cost and limited locations. Boutique, not backbone.
Pros
- Dedicated SIMs = clean reputation
- Stable long sessions
- Simple controls
- Great for delicate accounts
Cons
- High cost per line
- Limited country coverage
- No massive pools
- Scaling is expensive
Best for: Brand/influencer accounts where safety outweighs cost.
Polished UX and granular filters. City/ASN targeting is useful, but costs add up and the pool isn’t giant. A precise tool rather than a daily driver.
Pros
- City/ASN-level targeting
- Clean dashboard and visibility
- Good for region-specific ads
- Residential + mobile routes
Cons
- Smaller pool than giants
- Gets expensive at scale
- Support slower than top tier
- Occasional peak-hour slowdowns
Best for: Ad verification and location QA where precision matters.
Fast ISP-based routes with sticky sessions that actually stick. Coverage is narrower, making it a speedy secondary pool rather than a primary.
Pros
- Low latency; solid throughput
- Sticky sessions hold well
- Straightforward API
- Reliable uptime
Cons
- Narrower global coverage
- Fewer exotic carrier options
- Docs/support feel light
- Value depends on use case
Best for: Long, uninterrupted social sessions where speed matters.
Budget-friendly and fine for side projects or backups. At heavier loads I saw more instability, so I avoid it for critical client accounts.
Pros
- Cheap, easy onboarding
- Mobile and residential options
- API access included
- Good as contingency capacity
Cons
- Not stable under heavy load
- Weaker global coverage
- Trust not ideal for fragile accounts
- Support can be slow
Best for: Cheap backups and light experiments.
Boutique service with dedicated European SIMs and clean IPs. Keeps accounts safe, but limited geography and higher per-IP costs make scaling tough.
Pros
- Exclusive SIM-based routes
- High trust score
- Clear session control
- Great for influencer accounts
Cons
- Expensive per IP
- Limited to a few EU countries
- Not built for large campaigns
- Less flexibility overall
Best for: European influencer or boutique brand accounts.
Convenient inside Multilogin’s ecosystem. Outside it, coverage and flexibility feel limited. Makes sense if you’re already committed to Multilogin workflows.
Pros
- Seamless Multilogin integration
- Sticky sessions behave fine
- Okay pricing for small bundles
- Simplifies all-in-one setups
Cons
- Ecosystem lock-in
- Modest coverage
- Not flexible for mixed stacks
- Lags behind standalone rivals
Best for: Multilogin-centric teams prioritizing convenience.
César Daniel Barreto
César Daniel Barreto is an esteemed cybersecurity writer and expert, known for his in-depth knowledge and ability to simplify complex cyber security topics. With extensive experience in network security and data protection, he regularly contributes insightful articles and analysis on the latest cybersecurity trends, educating both professionals and the public.